RELIGIOUS FREEDOM UNDER FIRE

OBAMACARE IS BEGINNING TO SOUND A LOT LIKE NAZI SOCIALISM

On December 5th, 2009 I wrote a warning that I believe few either read and fewer even cared to know. We were only a month or so away from the grand fight regarding what is now called ObamaCare. It was the third in a four part series that I launched regarding socialized medicine and the lack of benefit from it. Those who closely assessed the situation noted that the nationalized healthcare debate would be a political bloodletting. Something we have not ever seen before and nothing like we will ever see again, that is until this next Presidential election. In that blog from December 2009 I noted that there were two quiet elements that were told to be cautiously discreet, but were to be extremely active in the lobbing process: the pornography movement and the gay/lesbian groups. The reasons for these groups being involved is because of the rampant diseases that are caused by these lifestyles. And yes they are lifestyles. I am willing to admit that I have no evidence of this theory except of past comments and harsh criticisms about those government entities which did not wish to use Federal funds for AIDS research. However my greatest concern was presented in this article and in the fourth and final article called Healthcare and Ministry/Non-Profit Issues, which was posted just before the final vote that plunged our nation, not into socialism, but into communism, on March 20th, 2010. On that fateful day America as I knew it ceased to exist and a new order of high-archaism had begun. This was the day that the Democratic-Republic that so many had fought and died for ended. Our greatness as a free society and nation was squelched by those who lied and continue to lie. The issue that I was most concerned with in both articles was the freedom of conscience and religion.[i] Once these two are destroyed, then our liberties evaporate instantly. I am quickly reminded of statements from both Martin Luther and Roger Williams who claimed that freedom of conscience was of the highest standing for any society to remain free regarding its religion. This law, if allowed to stand by our Supreme Court, violates both.

I have spent almost thirty years debating and arguing with individual Christians and churches of all sizes that this day was coming, now it has arrived. CNSNews.com reported that the Obama administration is now, under the healthcare law, questioning whether the Catholic churches, hospitals, universities, and other institutions should be exempt from providing abortion, contraceptives or other forms of “reproductive services” to people.[ii] Now the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is being called lobbyists[iii] by Nancy Pelosi, who was the Speaker of the House during the fiasco that lead to the passing of the most comprehensive economic, religious, and unconscionable takeover, ever! They have targeted the strongest and biggest anti-abortion organization in the world. I am sure that the idea is if the mighty fall, then the lesser will fall in line to do as has been told.

However, the greater concern should be what both articles bring out; anyone who is an individual Catholic cannot choose to opt out of assisting in those procedures. It is in direct violation of the idea of freedom of conscience. Our Constitution notes that, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;;...”[iv] The last phrase deals with the idea of conscience and the freedom to practice religion as long as that practice does not jeopardize the lives of those around us. In other words I have the right to believe as I wish as long as what I believe does not cause damage or destruction to someone else. Anyone who has an objection to abortion based on conscience should not be made to preform or assist in the abortion. There are plenty of others who would be willing to do such a hideous act.

While I am not a Catholic and Be Devoted Ministries is not aligned with the Catholic Church; while I may have some deep theological disagreements with Catholicism; while I do not believe that the Catholic Church is historically the true church of Jesus Christ; I will do what I can to fight for their rights to practice and teach what they believe. Why? Because today it is the Catholic Church, tomorrow it is you and I. Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) was a pastor during the days of Adolph Hitler in Germany. He is the one who said, “First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out --Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out --Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out -- Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me -- and there was no one left to speak for me.” Edmund Burke (January 12, 1729 – July 9, 1797) noted, “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” So much of what the Obama administration is taunting from its post-modern philosophy reminds me of the story about Hitler who told a young pastor protesting the socialistic control of life and religion to, “Sit down, shut up. I will take care of the physical needs of the people; you take care of their spiritual needs.” We have now entered this kind of thinking.

Finally, this is more of the same lack of substance that the Obama administration is known for…broken promises. Bart Stupak is a name that should be familiar with anyone who remembers this fight. Stupak was the leader of twelve pro-life Democrats who were holding the process up of passing the healthcare legislation. At this point in the fight on March 3rd, 2009, the Democrats and their socialistic friends did not have what it took to make the final push on this massive intrusion of liberty and freedom. However, after a meeting with the President of the United States, Stupak caved with the other twelve. They caved on a promise that President Obama would not allow abortions to be performed by executive order.[v] One year later Stupak still had no regrets even though the President acted on his post-modern beliefs and failed to ever sign any executive order in regards to not federally funding abortions.[vi] This reminds me of the Biblical account about the two brothers named Jacob and Esau. Esau was a hunter, while Jacob tended sheep. One day Esau came back to the camp hungry, stating he would do anything for some stew which Jacob was cooking. Jacob conned him out of his first born birthright, which Esau stated he really didn’t care about.[vii] The New Testament writer of the book of Hebrews notes, “See to it that no one comes short of the grace of God; that no root of bitterness springing up causes trouble, and by it many be defiled; that there be no immoral or godless person like Esau, who sold his own birthright for a single meal. For you know that even afterwards, when he desired to inherit the blessing, he was rejected, for he found no place for repentance, though he sought for it with tears.”[viii] I wonder if the same will be said for Mr. Stupak and those who cratered to the power of the President rather than to the authority of God.

Those of us who are Christians and Conservatives are at a crossroads. We must either choose to fight this based on the Constitution or die trying. My son’s life is depending on it; your children and grandchildren’s lives are depending on it; the future of a free society is depending on it. This could be the year of re-establishing the Constitution or it could be the nightmare of what Mark Levin calls a post Constitutional nation. If the later prevails we will be only a footnote in the annals of history. If we succeed then history will remember us for our courage. I myself will stand against this tyranny because Scripture compels me too. Together we must stand so that men, women and children may, in free conscience carry out what they believe in peace and faithfulness. As Martin Luther said after his trial at Worms, “Unless I am convicted of error by the testimony of Scripture or by manifest evidence...I cannot and will not retract, for we must never act contrary to our conscience....Here I stand. God help me! Amen!”

Amended Thought
I originally wrote this article on December 8th, 2011, but did not have time to post it. Now the Obama administration as dug its heels in on this issue. At this posting they have decided, even with a split within the White House staff, to continue this policy against the First Amendment. Also though I have only read portions of his new book, Ameritopia, Make Levin has done an excellent job at over viewing what is going on. This book is not for the faint hearted. Remember that I warned religious issues would be violated. Allow me to warn everyone of one more thing; the IRS is in charge of this power grab. If we do not speak now we will loose the freedom under 503 (c) status to say anything. As of yesterday the Southern Baptist entities spoke out against this in a wired release from Lifeway and GuideStone. This thing will spread; already Catholic chaplains in the military have been told that they cannot speak out against this situation. If you want to know just how corrupted things can become and how substandard care by a government body will be please read an article from The Lancet, which tells how people who are under the Romanian health care law have to bribe doctors to help take extra care of them.[ix] Folks we cannot allow Mr. Obama a second term. I will follow up in the next day or two about his latest State Of The Union speech and critic what was said. Until then, God help us all!

Amended Thought-2

Only a few minutes after I posted this blog the President of the United States, Barak Obama, came out and announced a compromise. However, as with anything of this nature there are two problems. First, it is not up to him to determine who will and will not be able to live by or not live by a certain conviction. Second, constitutionally he is out of place, because such powers are not given to him by neither the people nor God. Folks this fights not over yet.

Steven Swaim
[i] http://bedevotedministries.blogspot.com/2009/08/socialized-medicine-good-bad-or.html; http://bedevotedministries.blogspot.com/2009/11/dems-are-wanting-you-to-demo-on.html; http://bedevotedministries.blogspot.com/2009/12/where-is-samuel-adams-when-you-need-him.html; http://bedevotedministries.blogspot.com/2010/03/healthcare-and-ministrynon-profit.html

[ii] http://cnsnews.com/news/article/wh-obama-undecided-whether-impose-regulation-forcing-catholics-act-against-their-faith; (November 30. 2011)

[iii] http://cnsnews.com/news/article/pelosi-dismisses-catholic-bishops-lobbyists-opposing-obamacare-reg-forcing-catholics (December 1, 2011)

[iv] Constitution of the United States of America

[v] http://wizbangblog.com/content/2010/07/14/federally-funded-abortions-brought-to-you-by-bart-stupak.php

[vi] http://www.lifenews.com/2011/03/23/stupak-no-regrets-for-role-in-allowing-pro-abortion-obamacare/

[vii] Genesis 25:27-34, New American Standard Bible

[viii] Hebrews 12:15-16, New American Standard Bible

[ix] http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(12)60214-1/fulltext

Is The Sales of Liquor Really Good For A Community

Explanation: Below is a letter to the editor of the Mesquite News. There were three things which prompted this letter. One were comments made by Mr. Gary Huddleston which aired on May 2, 2011 on WBAP (96.7 FM/820 AM-Dallas/Fort Worth). His comment regarded the issue of “the myth” of crime and alcohol sales. The second issue is the ongoing two faced/underhanded ways the city counsel of Mesquite, Texas continues to shirk their responsibilities as citizen leaders while at the same time quietly making deals with the liquor industry. They continue to place the whip on the backs of the citizens to keep the city clean through ordinances on residential properties, but are unwilling to do their part by leading the citizens to rally against the issue of beer and wine sales. The final reason that prompted this letter is the apparent and very disgusting way in which the election was viewed. Because the city counsel chickened out on their responsibilities to make this issue well know very few people realized it was on the ballet. I for one spoke 25 to 30 people only two to three days before the election. None of them had any idea that it was on the ballet. Also, those who were for this being passed are now gloating. I plan on attempting to rally as many people as possible to take this fight back to them and repeal this on the next election. For those who are friends of mine in Forney…according to my sources your next.

Disingenuous Myths And Destructive Outcomes

I believe that the title to you May 19^th lead “Election Day cheers” is very misleading and I find Mr. Gary Huddleston very disingenuous as well. I also feel that the leadership in Mesquite deserves the tagged call of hypocrites as well. I realize by starting my thoughts off this way you will probably give very little attention to what I am about to say, but then again we no longer live in the land of free speech and truthful reporting any more do we? Allow me to build my case and you can determine if what I am saying is worth your time. Then again this will start showing up on several conservative blogs anyway.

Let me start with Mr. Gary Huddleston, who in an interview with WBAP on May 2, 2011 stated that it was time to debunk the myth that crime and alcohol sales were tied together. With authority in his voice he claimed that the surrounding communities had proven what he believed because their crime rate had not increased significantly since they voted wine and beer sales in. It is very clear that Mr. Huddleston is not very well versed in the facts of this issue. First, he cites no studies. However, there are plenty of studies to state otherwise. In 2007 Berkley University in California did a statistical study regarding this question in a paper called “Do Liquor Stores Increase Crime and Urban Decay? Evidence from Los Angeles’” (www.colgate.edu/portaldata/imagegallerywww/2050/.../teh_jobmktpaper.pdf). The answer in the paper is a resounding yes. There is no question that liquor sales, especially from liquor stores do lead to greater aggravated crimes. This means that the sales of a substance which is often abused leads to greater spousal/significant other abuse, stronger risk of child neglect and abuse, robbery of the establishment itself as well as the community at large; and assaults, battery, murder, and alcohol related deaths by accidents go up proportionately as a result. (www.sacbee.com/static/maps/crimemap.html) Also, don’t forget that now that we have this as something that will be substantially available; the criminal activity of juvenile abuse of this substance will go up. That means any tax monies brought into the city will be used form special law enforcement units that will have to covertly police this situation. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposed that communities would need to spend anywhere between 15,000 to 20,000 extra dollars a year to cut down on this issue alone. (www.pachiefs.org/.../NHTSA%20HVE%20Youth%20Access%20to%20Alcohol%20Demo%20R...) In some situations it can be up to 50,000 dollars a year. (http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2005-09-27/full_text) What will need to be understood is that cost would increase every year, it is not a one time thing. In fact the crime which goes with liquor sales was so bad in south Berkley, California that in 2005 a campaign was launched to drive the liquor industry out.( www.dailycal.org/article/18063) Therefore we can clearly see what Mr. Huddleston believes is the real myth. Also, if Mr. Huddleston really cared about our city he would not have continued to waste tax payer’s monies by continually bringing it up. Remember it cost to have propositions placed on the ballet itself.

Second, I think it is ironic that you have two articles one on page 2A and the other on page 3A. The one on page 2A deals with “Fishin’ at the park” where families are encouraged to bring their children out for a day of fishing at City Lake Park. Nothing wrong with that. The other was called “Spring Cleaning” where we are being encouraged to bring our recyclable items to Poteet High School in order to help keep our city clean. Nothing wrong with that! However in light of the election and what is about to expire I find it ironic and hypocritical. While I know that our city counsel did not indorse the wine and beer sales, they have been very quiet about it. It reminds me of Edmund Burke’s statement, “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” In the realm of law a person who does not assist someone who has been injured by someone else, is as guilty as the person who was the perpetrator. The same is true here. Our city counsel showed no leadership on this issue. Also, they continue to heap more and more ordinances on the citizens, but ignore the fact that the city will become more and more polluted with beer cans and bottles. Many friends I have who live on the edge of the Mesquite and Balch Springs border will attest to the fact that they clean more beer bottles and cans out of the yards then they use too. A recent study shows that when alcohol is just introduced into the home, children residing at that residence are 30 times more likely to become alcoholics. If it is consumed in front of them and introduced to them at an early age (6 years to 20 years of age) they are 50 times more likely to become alcoholics.( http://www.drugfree.org/join-together/alcohol/teens-who-drink-with-adult-supervision-have-more-drinking-problems-study-finds) Funny to the Mesquite News never brought this study up during this vote. If our city really wants to stay clean more ordinances is not the answer. And if we want to be known as a family friendly city, more sponsored activities alone will not do it. I can pretty well bet that at some of the larger city sponsored activities liquor will be sold there as well. Our city leaders should have stood up and denounced the idea of liquor sales. I know they could not have stopped the voters from voting on it, but they could have shown some backbone and lead the way.

Last, allow me to take time to stroll down memory lane. The year was 1979 or 1980. Those years were remembered for a lot of things; being one of the coldest winters on record; having a hard fought political battle for the White House; the death of 7 teenagers on Beltline Road as the result of a drunk driver. I was a freshman in high school during that time. In 2005 I was handed the name of a gentleman from the ministries at First Baptist Sunnyvale. They wanted me to go visit a man. My wife and I went to a run down apartment in Balch Springs and knocked on the door. A gentleman came to the door and we asked for the person we were looking for. He stated that the person we were inquiring about was not there. We left our materials along with ministry cards and returned home. A few days later one of the staff members from Sunnyvale contacted me and asked that I call the gentleman that evening. I made the phone call. The person we had met at the door was the person we were looking for. He quickly apologized and began to tell me a story that made my hair stand on end. The man I was talking too was the man who had killed those teenagers that fateful night. His life was never the same; it was eaten by guilt, drugs, alcohol, and dependant relationships. He had no true frame of mind to really work with. That night of the accident he left with some minor injuries. The woman with him had a broken arm, but all seven teenagers in the other car were dead. They only lived a few blocks from where the accident happened. This is only one example of many that could be brought up in regards to alcoholic driving. Not only that but because these kinds of accidents will become more prevalent we can expect our car insurance to go up as well. Mine already has and according to my agent, this election had something to do with it.

My final thought is that Mr. Huddleston and his group should not gloat over this too much, it was only a 1% win. They won by 150 votes. That means the citizenship in this city are heavily divided over this issue. The fight is not over! I suggest that those of us, who oppose the sale, regroup and take the fight back to them on the next elections. And maybe by that time we will have the courage to vote some real leadership onto the city counsel and vote the liquor out.

Thank You,

Steven Swaim
President and Founder of Be Devoted Ministries
www.bedevotedministries.blogspot.com
I am available for speaking engagements. Please feel free and contact me with any questions.

How many Christians groups does it take to change a light bulb?

Let's have a little fun. I am still in classes so bear with me but just so that we can have some fun read this:
Enjoy! My favorites are #1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12 (take a deep breath before you read this one), 14, and 15 (breath deep on this one as well).



http://www.biblebelievers.com/Lightbulb_Title.gif

1. How many Charismatics does it take to change a light bulb?

One to change the bulb and nine to pray against the spirit of darkness.

2. How many Calvinists does it take to change a light bulb?

None. God has predestined when the light will be on. Calvinists do not change light bulbs. They simply read the instructions and pray the light bulb will be one that has been chosen to be changed.

3. How many Armenians does it take to change a light bulb?

All. They need everyone to make sure it stays on. One can never really be sure.

4. How many Baptists does it take to change a light bulb?

Change???

5. How many neo-orthodox does it take to change a bulb?

No one knows. They can't tell the difference between light and dark.

6. How many TV evangelists does it take to change a light bulb?

One. But for the message of light to continue, send in your donation today.

7. How many independent fundamentalists does it take to change a light bulb?

Only one, because any more might result in too much cooperation.

8. How many liberals does it take to change a light bulb?

At least ten, as they need to hold a debate on whether or not the light bulb exists. Even if they can agree upon the existence of the light bulb, they still might not change it, to keep from alienating those who might use other forms of light.

9. How many Catholics does it take to change a light bulb?

None. They always use candles.

10. How many worship leaders who use guitars does it take to change a light bulb?

One. But soon all those around can warm up to its glowing.

11. How many members of an established fundamental Bible teaching church that is over 20 years old does it take to change a light bulb?

One to actually change the bulb, and nine to say how much they liked the old one.

12. How many United Methodists does it take to change a light bulb?

This statement was issued: "We choose not to make a statement either in favor of or against the need for a light bulb. However, if in your own journey you have found that a light bulb works for you, that is fine. You are invited to write a poem or compose a modern dance about your personal relationship with your light bulb (or light source, or non-dark resource), and present it next month at our annual light bulb Sunday service, in which we will explore a number of light bulb traditions, including incandescent, fluorescent, three-way, long-life, and tinted-all of which are equally valid paths to luminescence. "

13. How many Amish does it take to change a light bulb?

"What's a light bulb?"

14. How many youth pastors does it take to change a light bulb?

Youth pastors aren't around long enough for a light bulb to burn out.

15. How many Southern Baptists does it take to change a light bulb?

109. Seven on the Light Bulb Task Force Subcommittee, who report to the 12 on the Light Bulb Task Force, appointed by the 15 on the Trustee Board. Their recommendation is reviewed by the Finance Committee Executive of 5, who place it on the agenda of the 18 member Finance Committee. If they approve, they bring a motion to the 27 member church Board, who appoint another 12 member review committee. If they recommend that the Church Board proceed, a resolution is brought to the Congregational Business Meeting. They appoint another 8 member review committee. If their report to the next Congregational Business Meeting supports the changing of a light bulb, and the Congregation votes in favor, the responsibility to carry out the light bulb change is passed on to the Trustee Board, who in turn appoint a 7 member committee to find the best price in new light bulbs. Their recommendation of which Hardware Store has the best buy must then be reviewed by the 23 member Ethics Committee to make certain that this hardware store has no connection to Disneyland. They report back to the Trustee Board who, then commissions the Trustee in charge of the Janitor to ask him to make the change. By then the janitor discovers that one more light bulb has burned out.

-Author unknown

Same Sex Issues-Part 2

Jennifer Knapp Announcement-Part B
Can A Christian Be “Gay”?

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/music/interviews/2010/jenniferknapp-apr10.html

http:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xDWc7SvBOA


Last week I discussed my disappointment with Jennifer Knapp and her announcement about being lesbian. Many of you have wanted me to rush to judgment regarding the issue as too whether a Christian can be homosexual or not. I would prefer not to do that at this point, but want to take this opportunity to explore this issue in detail.

Attached are two links of two different interviews in which she makes her announcement. The first is with Christianity Today and the other is a You-Tube copy of the Larry King Live show where the announcement was made. It also includes Pastor Bob Botsford and Ted Haggard as part of the debate. The You-Tube link is in four parts. Part four is very interesting to me because of the rabble which occurs at the end. I’ll deal with this at the appropriate opportunity.

Allow me to also remind everyone as we go through this discussion that we are exploring science, statistics, culture, history and Scripture together in order to come to the final answer. This may take several weeks or even months to get to. Stick with me and wait to criticize at the end of the discussion.

Several of you have e-mailed me that you had read an article several weeks ago, hearing that this announcement had already been made. If you will read the previous blog you will note that I had already heard the rumors of what was transpiring. The article that some of you are noting is from Christianity Today on an April 13, 2010 online interview which Jennifer Knapp participated in, which I had already read.

Allow me to be very critical at this point of Ms. Knapp. In the Christianity Today interview everything is going fine until Mark Moring corners her with a question regarding the homosexual issue. Ms. Knapp is very frank about how she really does not want to discuss the issue, but Mr. Moring presses the subject. Once she is pressed then she openly states that she has been in a lesbian relationship for seven to eight years. She also states that she really did not want to discuss it and basically attempts to blow Mr. Moring off. But his consistent pursuit pays off. She admits to it, then when asked if this was the reason she went incognito, she says no. However upon reading the complete interview it becomes clear that this may have, in fact, played a very important role in her leaving Contemporary Christian Music for a while. It also comes across that Ms. Knapp is attempting to get by the issue so that she can reclaim her thrown as one of the leaders in the CCM market. I have read this article four or five times through and found Jennifer Knapp very disingenuous and more focused on returning to her claim to fame then really wanting to glorify God.

This leads us to the interview with Larry King and the debate between her and Pastor Bob Botsford as well as Ted Haggard’s input. Allow me to criticize some bloggers (http://pursuegod.wordpress.com/2010/04/23/jennifer-knapp-pastor-botsford-and-ted-haggard-on-larry-king/) who have made it their thing to criticize Pastor Bob Botsford. First, note that not everyone is a debater; therefore it would do well that if you do not know how to set up a truth table to prepare for the debate, you probably shouldn’t. This may very easily be the case for him. Also, during the interview/debate I found that everyone teamed against Mr. Botsford. I am not familiar with this gentleman, nor his ministry, but the blog which started this fire between him and Ms. Knapp (http://www.bobbotsford.com/2010/04/straight-to-the-truth-in-love%E2%80%A6/) seems to be something which showed great concern for what was occurring. I did not find it offensive, in fact while reading it you can tell there is a background that is familiar with those in the homosexual lifestyle. I will say though the he was not the best choice in regards to this topic. Someone like a John MacArthur who is more skilled in this kind of debate, would have been better. Mr. Botsford did start the debate and should have heeded Luke 14 and counted the cost before doing so. Having said that Mr. Botsford’s views were critical to the discussion.

Ted Haggard’s role in this dispute seemed somewhat squishy. (Is that a word?) He really never willingly touched on the topic. He constantly affirmed his belief in the Gospel and in the infallibility and inerrancy of Scripture, but never dealt with the issue itself. I believe that his final conclusion of Romans 1 and 2 can be questioned, while it may in part be correct. He constantly talked in circles about a love relationship with God, but never about the standards of that relationship and how that plays out. He made one weak attempt of saying it was like the love relationship with his wife and that there were rules, but he never enumerated on it much. Mr. Haggard’s answer to Larry King’s question as to whether homosexuality was a choice or not, was very ambiguous. I also found him ineffective because when Larry King and Jennifer Knapp were bombarding Mr. Botsford with technical questions, rather than being a theologian and discussing the technicals, Mr. Haggard just lets it happen.

Now to Ms. Knapp, from the get-go you could tell she was uncomfortable with the discussion of the subject. She really didn’t want to talk about it, it was an issue of conscience and you could tell. I found many of her answers to be inadequate. When asked if her lifestyle contradicted Biblical Christianity she attempted to circumnavigate and never gave a definitive answer. While some may criticize Mr. Botsford for not being very knowledgeable about the technical’s of the subject matter, may I say that same criticism should be handed out to Jennifer Knapp. I found her intelligent but not very skillful with the discussion either. She could never give the name of any historical theologians or reference specific scriptures which directly supported her lifestyle. She argued well, but did not debate agreeably. Again, I found her inconsistent and disingenuous. The real question which tell-tell this moment is when she asks (while being on the attack) Bob Botsford, “Would you have a young teenage girl setting in your congregation choose between her sexuality and her faith?” (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnOJnHjgkI0&feature=related) Here she shows her lack of knowledge in terms of the Scripture. Constantly Scripture is calling for Christians to make a choice between this and that regarding the Kingdom of Heaven verse the things of this world.

But what Ms. Knapp has done for us is brought into play the issue of identification. To this the scriptures speak clearly. Therefore, in the next part of our discussion we will layout the argument to see if someone is created (or evolved) to the point of being bent toward same sex relations. In the mean time I would express that Jennifer Knapp re-read the Gospels and attempt to see the call which the Lord Jesus makes in regards to our lives. Then she needs to balance that out with a strong reading of the epistles in light of the Old Testament for clearer understanding of the calling placed on an individual’s life when Christ becomes Lord.

Your comments are welcomed. Remember only debate the issue not the person.

Lord Bless,

Steven

Same Sex Issues

Part1

Jennifer Knapp Announcement-Part A

Can A Christian Be “Gay”?

Saturday night, April 24^th 2010, "Christian" singer/songwriter Jennifer Knapp made it official on Larry King Live...she's "gay." I watched with tears and embarrassment as she made her public announcement. In fact she didn't even say it originally, Larry King did! Now before I go too far with my criticism let me back up and run at this from a different angle than most have.

Back in 1999 my ex-wife walked out of my life. She took her two kids and almost eight years of my life with her. It was a difficult time for me. I was on the verge of moving ahead in the ministry as churches were starting to look at me as a candidate as the under-shepherd (pastor). Financially some things were coming together though we continued to struggle. On the extended family issues regarding religious differences they appeared to be settling down. It had been a hard eight years but I felt that every hardship was worth it, until she decided to walk out.

Times were tough as I struggled with the issue of divorce and financially because things were on the outset economically of going downhill. Many nights were spent crying over the loss along with the guilt of making things difficult in the marriage, but nothing worth a divorce. During that time I came across Jennifer Knapp in a video (yes video, they were still around at the time). I really felt consoled by the song and purchased the album. What was unique about her songs was that I felt everything she relayed was very Biblical and had a personal message about her relationship with Jesus Christ. I needed to hear this and I believe the Lord knew it, but then again He is omniscient. I also identified with something else in her songs...struggle. I could tell there was something unique because what she sang about and the way she sang it. Whether she knew it or not it spoke volumes regarding her personal life. Now remember where I am at this point in my life...I'm hurting and am very sensitive to those in pain. Before I would enter a new journey in life I would find myself ministering to an odd collaboration of people along the way. I believe that God heightened that sensitivity on purpose.

In 2002 I would meet Mary at Sunnyvale First Baptist, a large church in the Dallas area. We would get married in 2003. By that time I had become quite a fan of Ms. Knapp. I would have all her CDs and in 2002 went to hear and see her perform at a Franklyn Graham crusade in College Station. So imagine how I felt when all of the sudden Jennifer Knapp suddenly fell off the radar screen in 2004. Also try and guess what it felt like when all of the sudden the blogosphere opened up with rumors about her lesbian lifestyle. I, along with other fans, chose to wait and see what would happen. It was a long wait and after awhile the bloggers died down with their assumptions. Now think about the excitement when in 2008 it begins to surface that she would be making a major comeback. While I waited, along with others, in anticipation I did so with one eye on the awaited announcement and the other on the blogs. It had been bothering me for four years. The bloggers who had unfolded these accusations were very sure if themselves. I could only hope and pray that they were wrong, but something kept telling me they were right.

2008 came and went. So did 2009 as stronger rumors of her return began to emerge. At the same time my fears were beginning to be heightened because of where the publications were coming from. When her return was finally broadcast nothing was initially said of her same sex relations, but the declarations were not coming from the more well recognized Christian media. They were coming from more moderate emergent church leaders and gay and lesbian groups. As Sherlock Holmes would say to Dr. Watson, "The game is afoot." Or as we would say today, "Something ain't right."

I will end this blog here. Next time I will discuss the interview itself. From there it is my hope to explore the same sex issue and it's ramification on society. Hopefully it will be discussed from a loving, yet critical view using science, statistics, history, culture, and Scripture. These will be employed to show what this is all about and expose the lies which are being perpetrated by the media, political interests, and emergent church apostates. Your prayers will be needed, because some will falsely accuse me of hate speech. Remember it can only be contributed that way if, and only if, I insight physical harm on someone. Harming someone physically or their reputations is both wrong and not my desire. I believe that, except for self defense, harming anyone physically or reputation wise is both unbiblical and wrong. I will be honest and open about what I find, like it or not. If you continue to believe differently than I do then that is you right. Anyone who chooses to debate me needs to debate the issues not the person...no name calling...use respect!

God Bless,

Steven

TAX DAY MESSAGE

Sometime at the turn of the last century (20th) somebody got this really great idea…let’s tax the American people’s income. Originally the idea was to tax 1% of the total income. Now remember that at the close of the 19th century and opening of the 20th century the Federal government only had three basic obligations: secure the boarders, defend the nation, and govern by law. That was it! However, times were changing. There was discussion of roads which would reach from one coast to the other; the need for federalizing certain crimes; and the possibility of strengthen a standing armed force since things were starting to get very ugly in Europe. By 1913 the idea was ratified into the 18th Amendment.

Despite what most conspiracy buffs want you to think, the 18th Amendment was legal and despite a few potholes in ratification, everything was done as it should have been. That was then, but what about now? As most know the least in taxes you will pay is anywhere between 19-25% of your income. In other words you and I pay at least a bare minimum of 19 to 25 cents on the dollar. If you make over $250,000 dollars a year, that goes up. And that’s just on the federal income tax. For those of you who live and work in states that have state income taxes you pay more. Then there are all the federal and state sales taxes on the gas and other items we purchase. If that isn’t enough they now tax your retirement (even if you get Social Security) and if you die or better yet when you die you are taxed then.

In the health care debate it has been brought out that a consumption tax or value added tax (which is a sales tax) will be added to help pay for this. I (along with many of you) will be taxed for purchasing health insurance and will be fined (or taxed) if we don’t purchase any. (Me’s think they call that double jeopardy.) Presently food is not taxed, under the Obama plan it will. They have planned to tax you and I everywhere till sundown. In fact I bet they will tax us for watching the sun go down if we let them. What I am discussing is only the tip of the ice berg. It has officially been estimated that there is a possibility that we as American citizens will be taxed as much as 70% before it’s all over(http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2008/06/European-Levels-of-Taxation-Barack-Obamas-Tax-Plan ). Again understand that is 70 cents on the dollar. That leaves you and me with 30 cents to do or buy anything (including food). We have not seen this kind of out of control taxation since 1937 under the Franklin Roosevelt and later the Harry Truman administrations. I respectively ask you to read one of my previous blogs dealing with this (Socialized Medicine? Good, Bad, or Indifferent?)

The question may be asked, “If the federal and state governments tax us of our living so much do we have to pay our taxes?” For the Christian the answer is an undaunting, YES! Why you may ask. Because Jesus was clear in Matthew 22:21, “…render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's; and to God the things that are God's.” The idea is that if Caesar built it, it belongs to him. If you reside under his protective hand, payment for that protection is to be made to him. If you walk on roads he built, live in cities he approved for structure, live under his authority, you have to make payment. If Caesar prints the money then it belongs to him.

Jesus does not stop there. He makes a greater observation, we are not only to give the tribute that Caesar is owed, but we are to also give to God what belongs to Him. If we are paying back to the government what they own, then what is it that God owns? Simple, EVERYTHING!!! God owns it all. Why? Because He created it all, His authority is unlimited, and His power is unreachable. This means our very lives belong to Him. This is where government stops. In Job 2 God tells Satan that he can do whatever he wants to poor Job except take his life. Why? Because Job’s life belonged exclusively to God. Things could not be clearer. It is our lives which we pay tribute to God with, not money, even though the way we handle money may show how we are paying tribute to God. Paul the apostle would have agreed with this thought in Romans 12:1-2 were on bended knee he begs Christians to give their all to God as living sacrifices.

John Locke, known as the father of liberty, would agree with the assumption that if God owns the person, then nobody else should own them. As a British philosopher and minister of the 17th century John Locke had great influence on such men as Roger Williams. His view was that government should make a contract with its people, limiting itself to defending the people, not controlling them. Since God owned the person, then what the person owned was owned by God and government’s authority should be limited to taking care of the matters of state and defense and allow the people to govern their own affairs. It was the idea of a nation where people took responsibility of what they did and also of the government itself.

John Locke also had a great influence on our founding fathers such as Samuel Adams, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin. His writings would cause the birth of a nation which has been called the greatest experiment in history. Exclusively the United States was born from the influence of preachers, philosophers, and theologians, unlike any other nation before or after it. It is a nation where the church does not run the government, nor the government runs the church, yet each person involved in government is allowed to vote according to the dictates of their own conscience. As Martin Luther stated in Worms, “It is neither safe nor right to go against conscience.”

With this brief understanding how shall we proceed with a government which is encroaching more and more on our freedoms every day? What should we do about those who’s spending is out of control? Where should we turn in the process?

Allow me to note some things first before we come down to what we can do. As American Christians we have a responsibility and obligation that the rest of the world does not understand. I go to church with immigrants from Eastern Europe, who escaped communism and are concerned with the direction of our nation. Even then they can, at times, be critical of American Christians when we complain about the way things are going. However, there are some Biblical grounds for the way things run and I believe that what our founding fathers attempted to do was closer and is closer to God’s design for humanity. I know that it has been reported by the Chinese Christians that they pray that we will go through a persecution to wake us up. And who knows that maybe what it takes. I think we should understand that as long as we are faithful God in all that we do and draw close to Him constantly, then persecution will not be necessary. At the same time I also pray for their freedom so that the Gospel can be openly preached. So now how shall we proceed?

First, pray. I know, I say that every time, but this is the basis. We have to be a people of prayer. We need to pray for those who we disagree with as well as those we agree with. Again, Jesus in Matthew 5:43-45 is very clear about this. We are to pray for those who abuse us as well as those who love us. At the same time I do not believe this means we should willingly submit ourselves to abuse, but if abuse does happen then we are to be praying for those doing the abusing. We need to pray that God will give them favor for salvation; that they will become more compassionate and understanding; and that they will become more helpful with the needs of others. At the same time we should pray for those who we agree with so that they will stand the needed ground in order to preserve liberty.

Second, we should be involved. There are a number of ways in which citizens can be involved. One is to make sure we stay informed about what is going on. Learn and understand the issues at hand from all angles. Another way we can be involved is to write letters, e-mails and make phone calls to our representatives, senators, governors, city councilman, and mayors. Remember that the person, who runs for mayor today, may run for the senate tomorrow. An additional way to be involved is by giving to the person who discusses the issues you think are important. Finally, you can also show up in rallies. When doing this we need to be very careful about the way we handle ourselves. Rallies can become contentious especially if another rally is going on at the same time from the opposing side. Remember that our Constitution secures the right for peaceful assembly. Protest rallies can be both peaceful and Biblical as long as they do not move into a frame work of calling names. This is the reason why some ministers and preachers, especially younger ones, are speaking out against going to politically motivated rallies.

Third, stand your ground morally. What do I mean by this? Stop allowing society to declare what the norm should be. I have come to the point where when someone uses filthy language in excess, I say something. It is not right that my wife and child have to be subjected to someone else’s abusive language. While the Constitution guarantees free speech, it does not allow for abusive speech. There is a difference. No one has the right to use foul language in open public. Take the high ground morally and ethically every day. We may pay a heavy price for it, but in the long run it will pay off.

Fourth, pay your taxes. Right now the tax situation is what it is and we are all obligated to pay. Laws can be changed, but until they are, taxes have to be paid.

Fifth, vote. I have the attitude that if you don’t vote, you shouldn’t complain. Vote for the person you agree with.

Last, go to church and daily dedicate yourself to the living Savior. You and I have to understand that what goes on down here is small compared to the kingdom of God and what He is wanting. If we are not busy proclaiming the good news of Jesus Christ to the lost while there is free speech and while there is time, then we are missing the point. You see freedom means very little if we are not busy proclaiming the truth of Jesus Christ with it. There are people who have not heard the Good News of salvation through Jesus Christ. They do not understand that they are lost in their sins, bound by their lusts, greed and passions. They have no idea that Hell will become their eternal home without Him. There is no real conscience toward the fact that Jesus Christ bleed, suffered and died on the cross for, because of, and in place of their sin. They are blind to the idea that they are under the judgment of God and need this Savior. They do not care that He is bodily raised, nor are they concerned with the fact that He will return one day to judge everything they have ever done.

You see this is the reason I am concerned with freedom of speech, liberty of life. If we do not have these two things then the Gospel will have to go back underground and it will be suppressed from the masses that need to hear.

Let me know what you think.

God Bless,

Steven Swaim-President and Founder of Be Devoted Ministries

(All Bible quotations are from the New American Standard Bible (NASB)-Lochman Foundation)

ARE YOU READY FOR THE SURPIRSE WHEN IT COMES?

About two weeks ago Mary, my wife, came down with migraines which lead to her becoming very ill. The next morning I started to leave for work, when she started complaining of sever back pains. After a brief discussion I decided to stay home and take care of her. She called doctor who told her to go to the Labor/Delivery room and she would meet her there. Six hours later we left with a diagnosis of pre-labor start-ups. Two days later we went to the doctor for a normal check-up and Mary was put on bed rest. On Friday, March 26th, 2010, the doctor released Mary from bed rest. On Saturday March 27th, 2010 at 5:15 a.m. Mary woke me up saying that her water had broken. By 7:30 a.m. we were in Labor/Delivery and by 6:36 p.m. James Swaim entered the world. The point is that James was exactly one month early. He had captured Mary and me totally by surprise. His room was still being worked on; we still had one baby shower to go; I was still putting furniture together and the house was a wreck from Mary having been sick and me having taken a class at DBU. We were caught off guard.

Many would say that this is the way life works. But upon a deeper examination, some could argue that this is the way God Himself works. Scripture seems to bear this out. We could look at a variety of scriptures that display this thought.

From the Old Testament we could look in Genesis 12 at the call of Abraham. In Exodus 3 there is the sudden appearance of YAHWEH in the burning bush before Moses. Exodus 5 records the surprise return of Moses to Egypt. Joshua 1-5 tells of the shock of Joshua and the Israelites crossing the Jordan. It surprised King Saul and Israel that God chose David as the next king (1st Samuel 16). Nehemiah astonished Sanballet, Tobiah and Geshem with the rebuilding of the wall of Jerusalem (Nehemiah). And this hits only the highlights in the Old Testament.

In the New Testament things do not work much different. In Matthew 1-2 Jesus Christ took the world by surprise by being born even thought it had been prophesied for close to six thousand years, starting in Genesis 3. Not only did His arrival amaze people but in Matthew 7:38 His authority did as well. In Matthew 26 His crucifixion startled he disciples. But the biggest surprise was His bodily resurrection which is recorded in Luke 24. What seems to be more amazing to His disciples was the ascension into Heaven some forty days latter in Acts 1.

Looking back on all of this we might say, “Yeah, I can see were that caught them by surprise, but that was then and this is now.” WAIT!! There is more! The apostle Paul wrote of “…the coming of the Lord…” (4:15) in 1st Thessalonians 4:13-5:11. In 5:2 he states that this day, “…will come just like a thief in the night.” In other words we (all of humanity, saved and unsaved) will be caught by surprised. I know that not everyone reading this believes as I do regarding the “coming of the Lord.” And quiet frankly I don’t care!!! Each theological argument regarding this moment in time has hermeneutical and historical issues which comes with it. So you can argue among yourselves. My point is this, regardless of your view; regardless of your theological thinking; regardless of your drum beating belief; when Jesus returns we will all be caught by surprise. The point of Scripture is that no matter how things play out, in the end we are to be faithful to Him, because He will return.

I am reminded of a story by Chuck Swindoll about a black elderly woman in a Mississippi town. Every week she would go to town to grocery shop. Every week she would be taunted by three young teenagers about her faith. One day they yelled out and asked her in a jesting manner, “Hey, are you ready for Jesus to return?” She quickly snapped back, “Boys! I’sa stays ready!”

That is the point in question: Do you stay ready? How ready are you for the day of reckoning? Will the great Judge of Eternity find you guilty in your sins or righteous through the work of His resurrected Son? Only you can answer.

Have a happy Resurrection Sunday and let me know what you think.

Steven Swaim
President of Be Devoted Ministries